It has been two weeks since the inaugural Starship integrated test flight, (f you want to find out more about the first ITF you can read our previous entry here). In the short time since the launch a lawsuit filed on May 1st, in response to the launch and termination of Starship on April 20th. The lawsuit features 5 plaintiffs, The Center for Biological diversity, The American Bird Conservancy, The Surfrider Foundation, Save Rio Grande Valley, and The Carizzo/Comecrudo Nation of Texas Inc. This lawsuit is somewhat unique as the complaint is alleged against the FAA rather than SpaceX themselves, While unique in this way, this lawsuit itself was expected after any launch of Starship, regardless of the outcome.
Boca Chica and Starbase has been a cold war waiting to get hot between SpaceX, regulatory institutions, and environmental groups since the property was obtained in 2014. SpaceX initially obtained the property as another launch site for the Falcon 9, but evolved into the primary prototype facility for Starship beginning in 2019. The nearly 100 acre facility half of which is leased by SpaceX from the University of Texas who operated the property previous as the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. The property is nestled between a handful of protected areas, as well as a state park. Starbase Consists of the main production and manufacturing facility as well as the launch site further down highway 4 at the threshold of Boca Chica Beach. They have also recently acquired the Massey's site, (a former gun range) for testing further up highway 4. They have also been expanding into Boca Chica Village, a small bundle of houses, now mainly owned by SpaceX families.
The contention beings with the location, Starbase lays at the southern most tip of Texas along the Gulf Coast. The tropical setting is a unique habitat for wildlife, and the tidal flats harbor rare ecosystems. The prevalence of such factors has caused the environment to be a primary concern, even before the property was acquired. In 2012 the FAA issued a notice initiated an Environmental Impact Statement. This statement addressed the parcels of land designated for the launch site at the terminus of highway 4, as well as a smaller parcel for a control center further up highway 4. In 2014 the FAA released their finding of no significant impact and record of decision (FONSI/ROD). With that, SpaceX broke ground in 2014
With the finalization of the FAA's FONSI/ROD in 2014, SpaceX set its sights on Boca Chica. The initial footprint was modest, designed to cater to Falcon 9 launches. A single launch pad and accompanying infrastructure like fuel storage tanks and ground tracking stations dotted the landscape. The choice of Boca Chica was strategic, its proximity to the equator and sparse population made it a prime candidate for launch operations.
However, as the company's blueprint for the future began to solidify, the focus shifted from the Falcon 9 to a far more ambitious endeavor—the Starship. This shift in focus required a similar transformation in the Boca Chica facility. The humble launch site started its metamorphosis into a state-of-the-art spacecraft factory, soon to be known as Starbase.
Over the ensuing years, the facility began to grow both in scale and complexity. The construction of the towering high bay for the assembly of Starship prototypes was one of the first signs of this transformation. Alongside it, new buildings sprung up, dedicated to the engineering and fabrication work necessary for Starship's development. The launch pad, initially tailored for the Falcon 9, underwent a complete overhaul to accommodate the larger Starship and its Super Heavy booster.
With SpaceX’s vision for the future gradually materializing in the form of Starbase, the tide of change was not confined to the company’s operations. Local environmental groups, alert to the burgeoning activity in Boca Chica, made their concerns known. Organizations like Save RGV and the Sierra Club started advocating for the unique ecosystem surrounding the site. Their efforts led to tighter regulations, including the requirement for comprehensive environmental impact assessments before major expansions or alterations. The unfolding narrative at Boca Chica became not just about SpaceX’s technological aspirations, but an intricate dance between progress and environmental conservation.
SpaceX's shift in focus from Falcon rockets to the more ambitious Starship initiative was more than just a change in hardware. It represented a significant alteration in scope and scale of operations, and this change potentially warranted a fresh look at the environmental implications. The original PEA, conducted when SpaceX's plans were primarily focused on Falcon 9 launches, may not account for the broader impacts of a regular Starship launch schedule.
This is where an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) comes into play. An EIS is a more comprehensive review than a PEA. It takes into account direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on the environment, and is typically used for actions that are expected to have significant effects. If the lawsuit contends that an EIS is necessary, it implies that the plaintiffs believe the Starship program's potential environmental impact is greater than what has been assessed in the original PEA.
The process for obtaining a launch license involves multiple steps. SpaceX must submit a detailed application to the FAA, outlining the vehicle's design, flight path, safety measures, and the potential environmental impacts of launch operations. The FAA then reviews this application, which includes conducting an environmental review in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
The choice between a PEA and an EIS is determined by the FAA, based on the scale and potential impact of the proposed operations. A PEA is typically used when the environmental impacts are uncertain, while an EIS is required when the proposed action is expected to have a significant impact on the environment. With the Starship program, the FAA initially determined that a PEA was sufficient. However, the lawsuit alleges that the potential impacts of Starship's operations are significant enough to warrant a full EIS.
This ongoing legal battle underscores the delicate balance that must be struck between rapid technological progress and environmental preservation. The outcome will likely have far-reaching implications for the future of SpaceX's operations in Boca Chica, and potentially for the broader commercial space industry.
As the story continues to unfold, the world watches with bated breath. The verdict of this lawsuit is poised to set a precedent for how environmental considerations will shape the future of the commercial space industry. Will there be stricter regulations for future space operations? How will these considerations affect SpaceX's ambitious plans for Mars? Only time will tell.
Regardless of the outcome, this case underscores the importance of maintaining a delicate balance between technological progress and environmental preservation. This equilibrium will be crucial in determining the future of humanity's endeavors in the final frontier.
Stay tuned for an in-depth analysis of this lawsuit on the first episode of 'The Legal Frontier' podcast, where we delve deeper into the complexities of space law and its implications for SpaceX and the broader space industry.
Comments